According to @Ultra_Calls, an X post on Nov 20, 2025 alleges disparate legal treatment and tags @DOJCrimDiv and @realDonaldTrump but includes no court documents, docket numbers, tickers, or official statements, limiting immediate tradability. Source: @Ultra_Calls on X, Nov 20, 2025. The post references a separate item from @pelositracker without adding verifiable legal details or time-specific developments that would constitute a tradable catalyst. Source: @Ultra_Calls on X, Nov 20, 2025; @pelositracker on X, post referenced in @Ultra_Calls tweet, Nov 20, 2025. With no identified party, charge, or timing, there is no confirmed event-driven signal for DJT or related political-beta equities, and no clear spillover to BTC or ETH at this time. Source: @Ultra_Calls on X, Nov 20, 2025; independent trading analysis based on the cited posts.

According to @jchervinsky, the head of the DOJ's Criminal Division will speak at a crypto conference tomorrow and take questions from @amandatums, source: @jchervinsky. The session is highlighted as important for those tracking the Roman Storm case and the DOJ's use of Section 1960 to prosecute non-custodial software developers, source: @jchervinsky. The author urges stakeholders to tune in, underscoring the significance of enforcement themes that market participants follow, source: @jchervinsky.